In recent years, there has been a
growing number of Unmanned Aircraft Vehicles (UAV), also known as drones being
developed. The military has been the main investor into developing a reliable
and efficient way to use the UAVs. Now UAVs are being strongly considered as a
option for civilian use. This has led to much discussion about the future of
pilots and how it might affect our careers and the future of aviation. I feel
that with recent development, UAVs will be used in the civilian world, but in
ways that will not overtake what has been already established for the airlines.
There is still a lot of work that needs to be done before we see drones flying
over on a daily basis. One area is integrating UAVs in to the air system that
exist so that all participants will be able to conduct safe flight. Another
concern for the movement to UAVs is the regulatory process for the pilots and
the manufactures.
The
most difficult challenge is integrating drones into the National Airspace
System that has already been established, maintaining a high level of safety
and providing situational awareness for everyone in the sky. Congress has given
the FAA a deadline to come up with a system to integrate drones so they will be
able to use and access airspace by 2015. This is not a light task and will
require much work because of the current system that is in place and not all
aircraft are equipped with the appropriate technologies. To assist the FAA,
NASA has given input on the matter and has developed a two part process. Part 1
begins with a selected area where UAVs can participate. In this area they will
be able to to research and study ways to improve ground based equipment and
find ways they can manage drone traffic. Part 2 will be more focused on the
aircraft, studying the best options for collision avoidance to maintain
appropriate separation (Adams, 2013). These two phases will cover both air
traffic control issues and air traffic issues, however, this is only a tested
and controlled situation. During these times they will have competitors testing
and proving their navigation and awareness systems, to see who's system can
work the most accurately and reliable.
One
issue that will need to be configured better is finding ways to make the ground
control stations efficient in range and still provide the safety if something
were to go wrong with a link or a connection. Many of these drones will be able
to fly on preprogrammed routes with little assistance needed by a human, this
presents its own issues if something were to go wrong. These system thresholds
and minimums must have small tolerances to ensure the safety of other people in
the air and civilians on the ground. Domestic airspace accommodates more than
70,000 flights per day... The risk of collision between these users and
unmanned aircraft must be adequately mitigated before unmanned aircraft can
routinely utilize the national airspace system. An emerging technology,
Automated Dependent Surveillance-Broadcast (ADS-B) will be required on manned
aircraft by 2020 and will serve as the principal means for aircraft tracking
under NextGen (Elias, 2012). ADS-B could lead as a foundation for sensing and
avoiding that is a requirement for the drones in the civilian market as a
safety measure, however, at the time there is not a technology that can do this
and will most likely have to have multiple systems to allow this to happen
within a reasonable standard. Another challenge is protecting property and
people on the ground in the event of an emergency. Much of the work that drones
have been used for has been in sparsely populated areas and in the event of a
crash the chance of harm to others is significantly small. With smaller and
lower flying drones more challenges exist because of buildings, towers, and
lower flying aircraft that might not have the technology to detect other
traffic. These lower flying drones is causing a stir in the civilian world with
a concern in breach of privacy. Jeff Nesbit made mention to the growing number
of people that are concerned that drones could "invade our privacy to the
promise that drones and UAVs could represent a serious, new industry as dozens
of companies develop more than 150 new drone and UAV systems for all sorts of
uses in America." Legislators have introduce a bill that would limit the
amount of drone use, however, this was just a reaction to the public that will
only stand for a short time after the introduction of drones. Some programs
have backed out of the drone market because of the outcries in the public. As
of right now, the beginning plans would be to use drones for boarder control
and customs, to fly the boarders for surveillance. On the other hand, Nesbit
also makes reference to a study that is done by the Association for Unmanned
Vehicle Systems International (AUVSI), stating that with the development of
these drones it would create tens of thousands of jobs and could see $6 billion
dollars in projected sales just in the US alone (Nesbit, 2013).
Many
drones used today are unmanned in the sense that there are no humans inside operating
the aircraft, they are on a ground controlling station. There is still human
interaction with the drones and they can be completely controlled by a human on
the ground. Human performance considerations are critical in the design of
unmanned aircraft systems, as it is in aircraft systems today. A large area of
concern is the training requirements and the needed minimums in flight
operation and time. Bart Elias believes "the appropriate training and
qualifications may depend in part on the size of the aircraft and the
complexity of the system, as a 'one size fits all' approach may be
inappropriate given the diversity among vehicles, systems, and operational
missions." The Air Force is the only service that requires the pilots of
the drones are pilot rated officers, though all other services do not require a
pilot rated person to operate the drones and does not have specific training
required to control these drones (Elias, 2012). Alan Palmer, a director in the
University of North Dakota flight program as well as the development of a UAV
program, believes operation of smaller vehicles that can perform their roles
safely and efficiently below 400 feet will likely remain clear of the
requirement for FAA certification, due to the lack of air traffic at those
altitudes. Palmer also believes that requirements will be the same for flights
that will operate above 18,000 feet will require pilots of the drones to carry
a instrument rating (Glenn, 2013). Most of the systems that are used for the
drones are complex and are considerably different from one another, the FAA
might have to issue required type certificates for each individual drones. The
FAA might also require the operators of the civilian drones to be certificated
pilots. Another area that has not been set is the medical requirements for the
pilots of the drones. Will they need to have the same requirements as a pilot
or will the requirements be less because they are not in the air and on the
ground making the requirements not as stringent? As of right now there are no
requirements or regulations that are set for training requirements and
operation requirements.
With
many advancements to technology within recent years, it still might not be
enough to ensure the safety that will be needed for drone operation for
civilians. There is still work to be done, not only for the drone development,
but for the regulatory side of the operation. Both sides must make considerable
improvements before the deadline in 2015 if drones will have a significant role
in the aviation industry. I believe that it will be many years before humans
will trust them for air travel and cargo air transportation, on the other hand,
I see drones as strong candidates for broader control, police forces, aerial
surveillance, aerial mapping, or gas line monitoring. We will have a wait and
see approach for the use of UAVs and how largely it affects the aviation
industry.
References
Adams, Charlotte (2013, August 1).
Avionics Magazine: Integrating UAS in the NAS. Retrieved October 4, 2013, from
http://www.aviationtoday.com/av/military/Integrating-UAS-in-the-NAS_79730.html#.Uk8a_TK9KSM
Elias, Bart (2012, September 10).
Pilotless Drones: Background and Considerations for Congress Regarding Unmanned Aircraft
Operations in the National Airspace System. Retrieved October 4, 2013, from
http://www.fas.org/sgp/crs/natsec/R42718.pdf
Nesbit, Jeff (2013, April 25). Rapid
Rise of Unmanned Aerial Vehicles | Privacy Aircraft UAV. LiveScience.
Online. Retrieved October 4, 2013, from http://www.livescience.com/29069-us-drones.html
Pew, Glenn (2013, April 26). The
Drones Are Coming: Who Will Fly Them? AVweb Feature Article. Retrieved October 5, 2013, from
http://www.avweb.com/news/avtraining/ drone_pilot_training_forecast_uas_208586-1.html
Good post Steve, especially the title, it will probably my favorite of the year. But as for content, I think you did a good job explaining the current issue of UAV “pilot” certification. Since the different types of UAVs can range in size and complexity from a military Predator drone to a remote control toy, there is not just going to be an added category of “UAV” or “UAS” into the FAR’s, they will almost need their own separate regulations. Coupled with the fact that most of these drones are so cheap and easily made in comparison to actual planes, how will the FAA even enforce regulation if a person can easily make one themselves and start flying it around? I also think that a person who just buys or makes a drone will not be able to grasp the concept of airspace and regulations that take a significant time to learn in flight training.
ReplyDeleteI do not think the problem with drones and public acceptance lies within any commercial use, some of the most important facets of our economy are nearly entirely automated today. Most people will recognize that, with the right technology, computers can surpass humans in processing. That said, I think that the problem UAVs will face in the U.S. is due to the negative public image fostered by their use in the military and the risks it poses to our already shrinking sense of privacy.
ReplyDeleteI believe that UAVs will eventually replace some jobs that we see in the aviation industry. I think it will be many years before we are boarding aircraft without pilots for long flights but I think the UAVs have a lot of potential in the market. We may see some sort of hybrid in the beginning where a human is in the cockpit to monitor function of the UAV and has the ability to take control in the event of a malfunction. I am looking forward to what the future has to offer though. It may create lower fees over time if the systems are all automated... hmm.
ReplyDeleteI like the point you made about the integration of the UAVs. Right now we have an airspace set up for piloted aircraft, not drones. This will be a large limiting factor in this country when it comes to implementing UAVs into the airspace. Other counties have already very restrictive airspace unlike the U.S. which is mostly civilian airspace.
ReplyDelete