We
recently talked about the rapid grow of Chinas airlines and the promise that it
holds. Chinese airlines are not the only things that are a growing interest but
aviation in general throughout China has risen recently. I alluded in my blog, Aviation Global Expansion the
reason behind Chinas rapid growth is because much of it economy has remained
underdeveloped or unchanged for decades. Countries that have been the leaders
for economy grow and production have seem to have reached a steady point with
less grow, whereas, countries that were lagging behind are now catching up and
surpassing systems that have been instilled for years. China is finding new and
inventive ways to grow a hungry economy lead by political leaders, owners,
managers, and entrepreneurs. With Chinas economy developing in a day and age
that it is, it is easier for them to adapt to the world's economy today and
have a growing effect on the economical landscape throughout the world, whereas
countries that have been the leaders are having trouble adapting and changing
systems they have set years ago. This allows Chinese companies to learn from
the mistakes and the successes from others.
With this inability to change and
adapt, countries look to others that can help develop and grow their product
and still remain profitable. Many US companies are looking to foreign countries
with lower taxes and lower working wages, to optimize the profitability of their
business. Companies that use these foreign countries could also utilize the
economy and become a more competitive global brand. For the last 5 years or so
we have seen a rising number of corporations looking to options overseas to
maintain afloat and competitive. Aviation Industry Corporation of China (AVIC),
which is mostly government owned, and its subsidiaries have bought Cirrus
Aircraft, Continental Engines, and Epic Aircraft (King, 2012). Cessna plans on
moving towards full scale production in china as well, having already began
with the Cessna Skycatcher 162. Organizations such as AVIC and China Aviation
Industry General Aircraft Company (CAIGAC), are making it fairly easy and
appealing to a transition to production in China (General Aviation News, 2013).
These organizations have the space, people, and facilities for mass production
of these aircrafts, with the government only taxing the companies a fraction of
what the US is collecting from company taxes. Asian Business Aviation
Conference & Exhibition (ABACE), is a several day conference that provide
companies from all over the world a chance to see what opportunity is available
within the Asian countries and just how much the industry is growing there.
Many American aviation companies are 'excited, curious, and compelled' by what
Asia has to offer and how willing they are to invest in the success of these
companies (General Aviation News, 2013).
There is still much work before
general aviation is fully integrated in China's airspace. The airspace system
is somewhat reverse of how the US airspace was created. The US started its
airspace system based off of general aviation traffic and use. China's airspace
on the other hand, was built to handle commercial airlines traffic and use.
While the Chinese airspace system is safe and efficient it is outfitted for
airline use and is having difficulty accommodating any general aviation. In
China, pilots cannot leave a defined local area without permission. The
dimensions of this “birdcage” vary, but usually it is a radius of 5 statute
miles up to an altitude of 984 feet to 3,281 feet depending on local
circumstances. To leave these “birdcage" areas and fly between airports
pilots must have specific permission, arranged with considerable notice and a
very significant fee, flying along defined pre-approved routes. Not only does
leaving these areas come with a penalties, any operator of any aircraft, even
as small as a Piper Cub, is required to have an operators certificate. With the
operators certificate an operations manual, operating specifications, a
maintenance program, and more is required just in operating your own aircraft.
This requirement makes it impractical if not impossible for an individual to
operate an aircraft on his own (King, 2012). Booz & Company published a
report about the development of aviation and general aviation within China,
stating that there is 4 areas that have lead to the underdevelopment of the GA
sector in China: 1) Infrastructure and resource constraints; Lack of pilots and
development of pilots and few airports with low use of the airports being used.
2) Restrictive airspace; Very restrictive airspace, with limited accessibility,
not reaching its fullest potential and ability. 3) Restricted regulatory
environment; Lack of regulatory framework, lack or coordination between
regulations and policies, GA approval lengthy, time consuming, and costly to
the owners and operators. 4) Underdeveloped supply ecosystem; Technology and
engineering is limited, many aftermarket services underdeveloped with heavy
reliance on repairs overseas, Market is still in the early years of major
development and growth (MacCorkle & Wong, 2009). Although there is much
work to be done before GA becomes active on a wider scale, the framework and
desire is in place to greatly improve what has been established. There will be
a great effort in integrating a more GA friendly system and airspace, seeing
how politicians and entrepreneurs are seeking opportunity in this undeveloped
industry in China.
The most obvious side effect of
these aviation companies looking overseas is the loss of jobs and its negative
effects on the economy. Less jobs available leads to less revenue for the
country leads to less opportunity leading to higher unemployment leading to
less income for the government causing higher taxes... and the cycle continues
effecting many areas of the economy. These companies are producing millions if
not billions of dollars in revenue. Although the effects on the US may be easy
to identify, one must put themselves in the shoes of an owner, president, or
CEO of a company and see the situation in their eyes before making judgments on
their decisions. If placed in a situation to control the direction and outcome
of a company, you have to look at all options without a bias opinion and must
be willing and open to what might be the best option available. Companies
producing overseas could be saving them millions of dollars in operations and
still produce the same quality of product. If companies are able to produce a
product overseas and import the new items and be costing them a significant
less amount of money this does not fall back on the companies making these
decisions but the state of this country and government. More should be done to
obtain the production within the country instead of finding more ways to apply
a heavy tax on businesses to cover the governments deficits. Maybe the only way
to achieve this is... reconstruction?
References
Spence,
Charles (2013, September 24). General Aviation News: Exporting GA. Retrieved
October 18, 2013, from http://www.generalaviationnews.com/2013/09/exporting-ga/#more-83216
MacCorkle,
Jef & Wong, Timothy (2009). General Aviation in China: Seizing Growth
Opportunities. Booz & Company. Retrieved October 18, 2013, from http://www.booz.com/media/file/General_Aviation_in_China.pdf
Lysen,
Luke (2012, June 1). GA in China. Aircraft Owners and Pilots Association.
Retrieved October 18, 2013, from http://www.aopa.org/News-and-Video/All-News/2012/June/1/GA-in-China.aspx
King,
John (2012, March 12). The inscrutable future of GA in China. Aircraft Owners
and Pilots Association. Retrieved October 19, 2013, from http://www.aopa.org/News-and-Video/All-News/2012/March/27/The-inscrutable-future-of-GA-in-China.aspx
General
Aviation New Staff (2013, April 16). Cessna and CAIGA joint ventures gear up.
General Aviation News. Retrieved October 19, 2013, from http://www.generalaviationnews.com/2013/04/cessna-and-caiga-joint-ventures-gear-up/#more-77631
Good post Steve, I remember coming across some of the same information for my post. But you touch on the current restrictive nature of their airspace and regulations. What I think is rather odd about the idea of general aviation in China is that aviation for the general population, is supposed to be all about the ability to fly around freely between destinations. And in a country like China, where there seem to be more restrictions on almost everything, not just aviation, it seems almost contradictory to the free roaming nature of flying. I think that is why there will be a hard time for G.A. to really get going in China.
ReplyDeleteI think wether a company is hurting or just looking to expand, Asia is a good place to look. Airbus China is the only training facility in Pacific Asia, everyone in the area is sending people their way for training, and not just flight, but maintenance and flight crews in general.
ReplyDeleteGreat in-depth look at the situation in China and how it evolved to this point. I particularly liked the connections drawn to the opposite goals of aviation development starting from the origins of each country’s airspace use. It still seems applicable too, China focusing on how to squeeze more profit and potential out of their airspace and the US focusing on how to regulate the industry in ways they deem responsible. It’s quite like each nation’s view on pollution.
ReplyDeleteI like the part where you talk about the great lengths a Chinese pilot has to go to in order to fly his piper cub to another airport. We here in the United States take this for granted, the fact that we can fly in a vast amount of airspace without needing to talk to anyone, let alone get permission. This is what has allowed general aviation to thrive in this country. The freedom that an American pilot has in his own aircraft is unthinkable to a Chinese pilot. While the Chinese military controlled airspace makes little pockets of air for civilian use, U.S. civilian controlled airspace makes little pockets of airspace for military use called Military Operations Area.
ReplyDelete